Peter Robinson
I'm interested in designing new distributed and parallel algorithms, the distributed processing of big data, achieving faulttolerance in networks, and secure distributed computing in dynamic environments such as peertopeer networks and mobile adhoc networks.
News
 General Chair of ACM PODC 2019
 Program committee member of BGP 2017, SPAA 2016 and of SIROCCO 2016
 Giving a talk at a workshop on Dynamic Graphs in Distributed Computing (colocated with DISC 2016)
 Cochairing the program committee of ICDCN 2016
 Giving a talk at ADGA 2015, (4th Workshop on Advances in Distributed Graph Algorithms, colocated with DISC 2015 )
Keywords (Show all)
«Asynchrony» «Big Data» «Byzantine Failures» «Churn» «Communication Complexity» «Distributed Agreement» «Distributed Storage» «Dynamic Network» «FaultTolerance» «Gossip Communication» «Graph Algorithm» «Haskell» «Leader Election» «Machine Learning» «Mobile AdHoc Network» «Natural Language Processing» «P2P» «Secure Computation» «SelfHealing» «Symmetry Breaking»Publications tagged with "Distributed Agreement" (Show all)
2017

Breaking the $\tilde \Omega(\sqrt{n})$ Barrier: Fast Consensus under a Late Adversary
Peter Robinson, Christian Scheideler, Alexander Setzer. (under review)
Abstract...We study the consensus problem in a synchronous distributed system of $n$ nodes under an adaptive adversary that has a slightly outdated view of the system and can block all incoming and outgoing communication of a constant fraction of the nodes in each round. Motivated by a result of BenOr and BarJoseph (1998), showing that any consensus algorithm that is resilient against a linear number of crash faults requires $\tilde \Omega(\sqrt{n})$ rounds in an $n$node network against an adaptive adversary, we consider a late adaptive adversary, who has full knowledge of the network state at the beginning of the previous round and unlimited computational power, but is oblivious to the current state of the nodes. Our main contributions are randomized distributed algorithms that achieve consensus with high probability among all except a small constant fraction of the nodes (i.e., ``almosteverywhere'') against a late adaptive adversary who can block up to $\epsilon n$ nodes in each round, for a small constant $\epsilon >0$. Our first protocol achieves binary almosteverywhere consensus and also guarantees a decision on the majority input value, thus ensuring plurality consensus. We also present an algorithm that achieves the same time complexity for multivalue consensus. Both of our algorithms succeed in $O(\log n)$ rounds with high probability, thus breaking the known $\tilde\Omega(\sqrt{n})$ lower bound for fully adaptive adversaries. Our algorithms are scalable to large systems as each node contacts only an (amortized) constant number of peers in each communication round. We show that our algorithms are optimal up to constant (resp. sublogarithmic) factors by proving that every almosteverywhere consensus protocol takes $\Omega(\log_d n)$ rounds in the worst case, where $d$ is an upper bound on the number of communication requests initiated per node in each round.
2015

Fast Byzantine Leader Election in Dynamic Networks
John Augustine, Gopal Pandurangan, Peter Robinson. 29th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2015).
Abstract...Motivated by robust, secure, and efficient distributed computation in PeertoPeer (P2P) networks, we study fundamental Byzantine problems in dynamic networks where the topology can change from round to round and nodes can also experience heavy churn (i.e., nodes can join and leave the network continuously over time). We assume the full information model where the Byzantine nodes have complete knowledge about the entire state of network at every round (including random choices made by all the nodes), have unbounded computational power and can deviate arbitrarily from the protocol. The churn is controlled by an adversary that has complete knowledge and control of what nodes join and leave and at what time and also may rewire the topology in every round and has unlimited computational power, but is oblivious to the random choices made by the algorithm. Byzantine protocols for fundamental distributed computing problems such as agreement and leader election have been studied extensively for the last three decades in static networks; however, these solutions do not work in dynamic networks which characterize many realworld networks such as P2P networks. Our main contribution is an $O(\log^3 n)$ round algorithm that achieves Byzantine leader election under the presence of up to $O({n}^{1/2  \epsilon})$ Byzantine nodes (for a small constant $\epsilon > 0$) and a churn of up to $O(\sqrt{n}/\text{poly}\log(n))$ nodes per round (where $n$ is the stable network size). The algorithm elects a leader with probability at least $1n^{\Omega(1)}$ and guarantees that it is an honest node with probability at least $1n^{\Omega(1)}$; assuming the algorithm succeeds, the leader's identity will be known to a $1o(1)$ fraction of the honest nodes. Our algorithm is fullydistributed, localized (does not require any global knowledge), lightweight, and is simple to implement. It is also scalable, as it runs in polylogarithmic time and requires nodes to send and receive messages of only polylogarithmic size per round. To the best of our knowledge, our algorithm is the first scalable solution for Byzantine leader election in a dynamic network with a high rate of churn; our protocol can also be used to solve Byzantine agreement in a straightforward way. We also show how to implement an (almosteverywhere) public coin with constant bias in a dynamic network with Byzantine nodes and provide a mechanism for enabling honest nodes to store information reliably in the network, which might be of independent interest. In decentralized and dynamic P2P systems where a substantial part of the network may be controlled by malicious nodes, the presented algorithm and techniques can serve as building blocks for designing robust and secure distributed protocols. 
Gracefully Degrading Consensus and kSet Agreement in Directed Dynamic Networks
DOI
Martin Biely, Peter Robinson, Ulrich Schmid, Manfred Schwarz, Kyrill Winkler. 2nd International Conference on Networked Systems (NETYS 2015).
Abstract...We present the first consensus/kset agreement algorithm for synchronous dynamic networks with unidirectional links, controlled by an omniscient message adversary, which automatically adapts to the actual network properties in a run: If the network is sufficiently wellconnected, it solves consensus, while it degrades gracefully to general kset agreement in less wellconnected communication graphs. The actual number k of systemwide decision values is determined by the number of certain vertexstable root components occurring in a run, which are strongly connected components without incoming links from outside. Related impossibility results reveal that our condition is reasonably close to the solvability border for kset agreement.
2014

Distributed Agreement in Dynamic PeertoPeer Networks
PDF
DOI
John Augustine, Gopal Pandurangan, Peter Robinson, Eli Upfal. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, Elsevier. (JCSS).

The Generalized Loneliness Detector and Weak System Models for kSet Agreement
PDF
DOI
Martin Biely, Peter Robinson, Ulrich Schmid. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 25(4), 10781088 (IEEE TPDS).
Abstract...This paper presents two weak partially synchronous system models MAnti[nk] and MSink[nk], which are just strong enough for solving $k$set agreement: We introduce the generalized $(nk)$loneliness failure detector $\mathcal{L}(k)$, which we first prove to be sufficient for solving $k$set agreement, and show that $\mathcal{L}(k)$ but not $\mathcal{L}(k1)$ can be implemented in both models. MAnti[nk] and MSink[nk] are hence the first message passing models that lie between models where $\Omega$ (and therefore consensus) can be implemented and the purely asynchronous model. We also address $k$set agreement in anonymous systems, that is, in systems where (unique) process identifiers are not available. Since our novel $k$set agreement algorithm using $\mathcal{L}(k)$ also works in anonymous systems, it turns out that the loneliness failure detector $\mathcal{L}=\mathcal{L}(n1)$ introduced by Delporte et al. is also the weakest failure detector for set agreement in anonymous systems. Finally, we analyze the relationship between $\mathcal{L}(k)$ and other failure detectors suitable for solving $k$set agreement.
2013

Fast Byzantine Agreement in Dynamic Networks
PDF
DOI
John Augustine, Gopal Pandurangan, Peter Robinson 32nd ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC 2013).
Abstract...We study Byzantine agreement in dynamic networks where topology can change from round to round and nodes can also experience heavy churn (i.e., nodes can join and leave the network continuously over time). Our main contributions are randomized distributed algorithms that guarantee almosteverywhere Byzantine agreement with high probability even under a large number of Byzantine nodes and continuous adversarial churn in a number of rounds that is polylogarithmic in $n$ (where $n$ is the stable network size). We show that our algorithms are essentially optimal (up to polylogarithmic factors) with respect to the amount of Byzantine nodes and churn rate that they can tolerate by showing lower bound. In particular, we present the following results: \begin{enumerate} \item An $O(\log^3 n)$ round randomized algorithm that achieves almosteverywhere Byzantine agreement with high probability under a presence of up to $O(\sqrt{n}/\text{polylog}(n))$ Byzantine nodes and up to a churn of $O(\sqrt{n}/\text{polylog}(n))$ nodes per round. We assume that the Byzantine nodes have knowledge about the entire state of network at every round (including random choices made by all the nodes) and can behave arbitrarily. We also assume that an adversary controls the churn  it has complete knowledge and control of what nodes join and leave and at what time and has unlimited computational power (but is oblivious to the topology changes from round to round). Our algorithm requires only polylogarithmic in $n$ bits to be processed and sent (per round) by each node. \item We also present an $O(\log^3 n)$ round randomized algorithm that has same guarantees as the above algorithm, but works even when the churn and network topology is controlled by an adaptive adversary (that can choose the topology based on the current states of the nodes). However, this algorithm requires up to polynomial in $n$ bits to be processed and sent (per round) by each node. \item We show that the above bounds are essentially the best possible, if one wants fast (i.e., polylogarithmic run time) algorithms, by showing that any (randomized) algorithm to achieve agreement in a dynamic network controlled by an adversary that can churn up to $\Theta(\sqrt{ n \log n})$ nodes per round should take at least a polynomial number of rounds. \end{enumerate} Our algorithms are the firstknown, fullydistributed, Byzantine agreement algorithms in highly dynamic networks. We view our results as a step towards understanding the possibilities and limitations of highly dynamic networks that are subject to malicious behavior by a large number of nodes.
2012

Towards Robust and Efficient Computation in Dynamic PeertoPeer Networks
PDF
DOI
John Augustine, Gopal Pandurangan, Peter Robinson, Eli Upfal. 23rd ACMSIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA 2012).
Abstract...Motivated by the need for robust and fast distributed computation in highly dynamic PeertoPeer (P2P) networks, we study algorithms for the fundamental distributed agreement problem. P2P networks are highly dynamic networks that experience heavy node churn (i.e., nodes join and leave the network continuously over time). Our goal is to design fast algorithms (running in a small number of rounds) that guarantee, despite high node churn rate, that almost all nodes reach a stable agreement. Our main contributions are randomized distributed algorithms that guarantee stable almosteverywhere agreement with high probability even under high adversarial churn in a polylogarithmic number of rounds. In particular, we present the following results: \begin{enumerate} \item An $O(\log^2 n)$round ($n$ is the stable network size) randomized algorithm that achieves almosteverywhere agreement with high probability under up to linear churn per round (i.e., $\epsilon n$, for some small constant $\epsilon > 0$), assuming that the churn is controlled by an oblivious adversary (that has complete knowledge and control of what nodes join and leave and at what time and has unlimited computational power, but is oblivious to the random choices made by the algorithm). \item An $O(\log m\log^3 n)$round randomized algorithm that achieves almosteverywhere agreement with high probability under up to $\epsilon \sqrt{n}$ churn per round (for some small $\epsilon > 0$), where $m$ is the size of the input value domain, that works even under an adaptive adversary (that also knows the past random choices made by the algorithm). \item We also show that no deterministic algorithm can guarantee almosteverywhere agreement (regardless of the number of rounds), even under constant churn rate. \end{enumerate} Our algorithms are the firstknown, fullydistributed, agreement algorithms that work under highly dynamic settings (i.e., high churn rates per step). Furthermore, they are localized (i.e., do not require any global topological knowledge), simple, and easy to implement. These algorithms can serve as building blocks for implementing other nontrivial distributed computing tasks in dynamic P2P networks. 
Agreement in Directed Dynamic Networks
PDF
DOI
Martin Biely, Peter Robinson, Ulrich Schmid. 19th International Colloquium on Structural Information and Communication Complexity (SIROCCO 2012).
Abstract...We study distributed computation in synchronous dynamic networks where an omniscient adversary controls the unidirectional communication links. Its behavior is modeled as a sequence of directed graphs representing the active (i.e. timely) communication links per round. We prove that consensus is impossible under some natural weak connectivity assumptions and introduce vertexstable root components as a means for circumventing this impossibility. Essentially, we assume that there is a short period of time during which an arbitrary part of the network remains strongly connected, while its interconnect topology may keep changing continuously. We present a consensus algorithm that works under this assumption and prove its correctness. Our algorithm maintains a local estimate of the communication graphs and applies techniques for detecting stable network properties and univalent system configurations. Our possibility results are complemented by several impossibility results and lower bounds for consensus and other distributed computing problems like leader election, revealing that our algorithm is asymptotically optimal.
2011

Weak System Models for FaultTolerant Distributed Agreement Problems
Peter Robinson. PhD Thesis in Computer Science.
Abstract...This thesis investigates various aspects of weak system models for agreement problems in faulttolerant distributed computing. In Part~I we provide an introduction to the context of this work, discuss related literature and describe the basic system assumptions. In Part~II of this thesis, we introduce the Asynchronous BoundedCycle (ABC) model, which is entirely timefree. In contrast to existing system models, the ABC model does not require explicit timebased synchrony bounds, but rather stipulates a graphtheoretic synchrony condition on the relative lengths of certain causal chains of messages in the spacetime graph of a run. We compare the ABC model to other models in literature, in particular to the classic models by Dwork, Lynch, and Stockmeyer. Despite Byzantine failures, we show how to simulate lockstep rounds, and therefore make consensus solvable, and prove the correctness of a clock synchronization algorithm in the ABC model. We then present the technically most involved result of this thesis: We prove that any algorithm working correctly in the partially synchronous $\Theta$Model by Le Lann and Schmid, also works correctly in the timefree ABC model. In the proof, we use a variant of Farkas' Theorem of Linear Inequalities and develop a nonstandard cycle space on directed graphs in order to guarantee the existence of a certain message delay transformation for finite prefixes of runs. This shows that any timefree safety property satisfied by an algorithm in the $\Theta$Model also holds in the ABC model. By employing methods from pointset topology, we can extend this result to liveness properties. In Part~III, we shift our attention to the borderland between models where consensus is solvable and the purely asynchronous model. To this end, we look at the $k$set agreement problem where processes need to decide on at most $k$ distinct decision values. We introduce two very weak system models MAnti and MSink and prove that consensus is impossible in these models. Nevertheless, we show that $(n1)$set agreement is solvable in MAnti and MSink, by providing algorithms that implement the weakest failure detector $\mathcal{L}$. We also discuss how models MAnti and MSink relate to the $f$source models by Aguilera et al. for solving consensus. In the subsequent chapter, we present a novel failure detector $\mathcal{L}(k)$ that generalizes $\mathcal{L}$, and analyze an algorithm for solving $k$set agreement with $\mathcal{L}(k)$, which works even in systems without unique process identifiers. Moreover, We explore the relationship between $\mathcal{L}(k)$ and existing failure detectors for $k$set agreement. Some aspects of $\mathcal{L}(k)$ relating to anonymous systems are also discussed. Next, we present a generic theorem that can be used to characterize the impossibility of achieving $k$set agreement in various system models. This enables us to show that $(\Sigma_k,\Omega_k)$ is not sufficient for solving $k$set agreement. Furthermore, we instantiate our theorem with a partially synchronous system model. Finally, we consider the $k$set agreement problem in roundbased systems. First, we introduce a novel abstraction that encapsulates the perpetual synchrony of a run, the so called stable skeleton graph, which allows us to express the solvability power of a system via graphtheoretic properties. We then present an approximation algorithm where processes output an estimate of their respective component of the stable skeleton graph. We define a class of communication predicates PSources(k) in this framework, and show that PSources(k) tightly captures the amount of synchrony necessary for $k$set agreement, as $(k1)$set agreement is impossible with PSources(k). Based on the stable skeleton approximation, we present an algorithm that solves $k$set agreement when PSources(k) holds. 
Solving kSet Agreement with Stable Skeleton Graphs
PDF
DOI
Martin Biely, Peter Robinson, Ulrich Schmid. 16th IEEE International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing Workshops and PhD Forum (IPDPS 2011).

Easy Impossibility Proofs for kSet Agreement in Message Passing Systems
PDF
DOI
Martin Biely, Peter Robinson, Ulrich Schmid. 15th International Conference On Principles Of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2011).
Abstract...Despite of being quite similar agreement problems, distributed consensus ($1$set agreement) and general $k$set agreement require surprisingly different techniques for proving their impossibility in asynchronous systems with crash failures: Rather, than the relatively simple bivalence arguments as in the impossibility proof for consensus in the presence of a single crash failure, known proofs for the impossibility of $k$set agreement in shared memory systems with $f\geq k>1$ crash failures use algebraic topology or a variant of Sperner's Lemma. In this paper, we present a generic theorem for proving the impossibility of $k$set agreement in various message passing settings, which is based on a reduction to the consensus impossibility in a certain subsystem resulting from a partitioning argument. We demonstrate the broad applicability of our result by exploring the possibility/impossibility border of $k$set agreement in several message passing system models: (i) asynchronous systems with crash failures, (ii) partially synchronous processes with (initial) crash failures, and, most importantly, (iii) asynchronous systems augmented with failure detectors. Furthermore, by extending the algorithm for initial crashes of Fisher, Lynch and Patterson (1985) to general $k$set agreement, we show that the impossibility border of (i) is tightly matched. The impossibility proofs in cases (i), (ii), and (iii) are instantiations of our main theorem. Regarding (iii), applying our technique reveals the exact border for the parameter $k$ where $k$set agreement is solvable with the failure detector class $(\Sigma_k,\Omega_k)_{1\le k\le n1}$ of Bonnet and Raynal. As $\Sigma_k$ was shown to be necessary for solving $k$set agreement, this result yields new insights on the quest for the weakest failure detector 
The Asynchronous BoundedCycle Model
PDF
DOI
Peter Robinson and Ulrich Schmid. Theoretical Computer Science 412 (2011) 5580–5601. (TCS).
Abstract...This paper shows how synchrony conditions can be added to the purely asynchronous model in a way that avoids any reference to message delays and computing step times, as well as any global constraints on communication patterns and network topology. Our Asynchronous BoundedCycle (ABC) model just bounds the ratio of the number of forward and backwardoriented messages in certain ''relevant'' cycles in the spacetime diagram of an asynchronous execution. We show that clock synchronization and lockstep rounds can easily be implemented and proved correct in the ABC model, even in the presence of Byzantine failures. Furthermore, we prove that any algorithm working correctly in the partially synchronous $\Theta$Model also works correctly in the ABC model. In our proof, we first apply a novel method for assigning certain message delays to asynchronous executions, which is based on a variant of Farkas' theorem of linear inequalities and a nonstandard cyclespace of graphs. Using methods from pointset topology, we then prove that the existence of this delay assignment implies model indistinguishability for timefree safety and liveness properties. Finally, we introduce several weaker variants of the ABC model and relate our model to the existing partially synchronous system models, in particular, the classic models of Dwork, Lynch and Stockmayer. Furthermore, we discuss aspects of the ABC model's applicability in real systems, in particular, in the context of VLSI SystemsonChip.
2009

Weak Synchrony Models and Failure Detectors for Message Passing kSet Agreement
DOI
Martin Biely, Peter Robinson, Ulrich Schmid. 13th International Conference On Principles Of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2009).
2008

The Asynchronous BoundedCycle Model
DOI
Peter Robinson and Ulrich Schmid. 10th International Symposium on Stabilization, Safety, and Security of Distributed Systems (SSS 2008).Best Paper Award.
Abstract...This paper shows how synchrony conditions can be added to the purely asynchronous model in a way that avoids any reference to message delays and computing step times, as well as any global constraints on communication patterns and network topology. Our Asynchronous BoundedCycle (ABC) model just bounds the ratio of the number of forward and backwardoriented messages in certain ''relevant'' cycles in the spacetime diagram of an asynchronous execution. We show that clock synchronization and lockstep rounds can easily be implemented and proved correct in the ABC model, even in the presence of Byzantine failures. Furthermore, we prove that any algorithm working correctly in the partially synchronous $\Theta$Model also works correctly in the ABC model. In our proof, we first apply a novel method for assigning certain message delays to asynchronous executions, which is based on a variant of Farkas' theorem of linear inequalities and a nonstandard cyclespace of graphs. Using methods from pointset topology, we then prove that the existence of this delay assignment implies model indistinguishability for timefree safety and liveness properties. Finally, we introduce several weaker variants of the ABC model and relate our model to the existing partially synchronous system models, in particular, the classic models of Dwork, Lynch and Stockmayer. Furthermore, we discuss aspects of the ABC model's applicability in real systems, in particular, in the context of VLSI SystemsonChip.
Code
I'm interested in parallel and distributed programming and related technologies such as software transactional memory. Below is a (noncomprehensive) list of software that I have written.
 I extended Cabal, for using a "world" file to keep track of installed packages. (Now part of the main distribution.)
 data dispersal: an implementation of an (m,n)threshold information dispersal scheme that is spaceoptimal.
 secret sharing: an implementation of a secret sharing scheme that provides informationtheoretic security.
 diceentropy: a library that provides cryptographically secure dice rolls implemented by bitefficient rejection sampling.
 TSkipList: a data structure with rangequery support for software transactional memory.
 stmiohooks: An extension of Haskell's Software Transactional Memory (STM) monad with commit and retry IO hooks.
 Mathgenealogy: Visualize your (academic) genealogy! A program for extracting data from the Mathematics Genealogy project.
 In my master thesis I developed a system for automatically constructing events out of log files produced by various system programs. One of the core components of my work was a partofspeech (POS) tagger, which assigns word classes (e.g. noun, verb) to the previously parsed tokens of the log file. To cope with noisy input data, I modeled the POS tagger as a hidden Markov model. I developed (and proved the correctness of) a variant of the maximum likelihood estimation algorithm for training the Markov model and smoothing the state transition distributions.
Misc
 Conferences that I attended so far: PODC 2008 (Toronto, Canada); SSS 2008 (Detroit, USA); OPODIS 2009 (Nimes, France); ALGOSENSORS 2010 (Bordeaux, France); DISC 2010; (Boston, USA) IPDPS 2011 (Anchorage, USA); FOMC 2011 (San Jose, USA); SODA 2012 (Kyoto, Japan); SIROCCO 2012 (Reykjavik, Iceland); ICDCN 2013 (Mumbai, India); ICALP 2013 (Riga, Latvia); SPAA 2013 (Montreal, Canada); PODC 2013 (Montreal, Canada); Shonan Workshop (Shonan Village, Japan); DISC 2015 (Tokyo, Japan); ICDCN 2016 (Singapore); SPAA 2016 (Monterey, California); DISC 2016 (Paris, France).
 Program committee membership: BGP 2017, ICDCN 2016, SPAA 2016, SIROCCO 2016, ICDCN 2015, SIROCCO 2014, FOMC 2014
 DBLP entry.
 Google Scholar profile.
 Profile on StackExchange.